JUNE 2015
THE DOJ/FBI SAN DIEGO OFFICES PLANNED AND EXECUTED A CIVIL RIGHTS CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY IN THE FEDERAL COURTS, THAT BACKFIRED, WITH PUBLIC EXPOSURE, AND OPEN RIDDICULE OF DOJ ATTORNEYS FROM NINTH CIRCUIT COURT JUDGES (PART II)
PART I - 8 YR PUBLIC CORRUPTION CONSPIRACY
PART III - ELECTION FRAUD CONSPIRACY
THE LAW SAYS:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI in San Diego County, California have been criminally conspiring to Obstruct Justice, in the crimes of law enforcement personnel, their public unions, and the courts for at least eight (8) years. When confronted, the DOJ/FBI systematically lies about the obstructions, while DEFRAUDING the public treasury, and using their control of criminal complaints and investigations, to cover up public corruption. A culture of felony public corruption that rarely receives the public exposure it deserves.
The case of "The United States Vs. John Maloney" is one of those rare exceptions, that did not get "QUIETLY" buried by the DOJ, even thought the DOJ aggressively conspired to peruse that end. The Ninth Circuit did expose the corruption, and publicly humiliate the DOJ, but as usual they did nothing about the criminal conduct of DOJ Attorneys, and neither did any other law enforcement agency.
A case that involved DOJ preplanned civil rights violations, and Prosecutorial Misconduct, in the Federal District Court rooms, and the Appellet Courts, with corrupt Judicial support. A system of Prosecutor - Judge Public Corruption violations that is common in our local, State, and Federal Courts. A DOJ Attorney obstruction of justice that prompted a Defense Council appeal on the corruption, that in turn activated a DOJ two year criminal conspiracy, to cover up the civil rights assault.
The DOJ criminal conspiracy had multiple objectives and motives. The first was to protect the public image of the DOJ by covering up the crimes of a fellow prosecutor, and keep a know corrupted guilty verdict in place. However, the primary DOJ objective was to protect other on going public corruption cover up conspiracies, involving the DOJ and the FBI, in the San Diego Superior Court System, the San Diego DA's Office, local police departments, and many others public agencies.
THE DOJ MALONEY CASE PUBLIC CORRUPTION
USA LAURA DUFFY DECLINED TO BE INTERVIEW ON THE CORRUPTION
On June 2, 2010 Laura Duffy was appointed United States Attorney for the Southern District, in San Diego, California. A prosecutor, like so many others, with a reputation that the "ends justifies the means". Fifteen days later on June 17, 2010, a truck driver named John Maloney was arrested at a border patrol check point. Narcotics sniffing dogs had alerted Officers to a concealed stash of Marijuana. Maloney was later tried, convicted, and sentenced on August 5, 2011.
The problem is, the trial was intentionally corrupted by a DOJ "preplanned" illegal attack on Maloney's civil rights. A criminal attack that USA Duffy knew about and conspired to cover up. An illegal assault that numerous legal experts stated was clearly "Prosecutorial Misconduct".
A term that senior AUSA Bruce Castetter did not like to hear when he appeared before Appellate Judges. Castetter was literally pleading with the Ninth Circuit Court to not use those words in their decision concerning Prosecutor Miller's conduct in the Maloney case.
Castetter continued to complaint to the Court that he had not come to the court prepared to argue misconduct issues, as Judges heaped on more ridicule.
When Castetter was questioned on why Prosecutor Miller was not handling the appeal presentation, as is customary, Castetter could not come up with an answer that any of the Judges appeared to like, or believe. Castetter evaded the questions because he already knew the DOJ did not want Miller anywhere near that presentation, as Miller had previously confessed his misconduct to another Judge. The Judges made it clear to Castetter they already knew about Miller's confession. It is reported that Castetter later resigned from the DOJ.
THE TRIAL CORRUPTION
In 2011 DOJ AUSA Steve Miller, Lead prosecutor in the Maloney case was obviously concerned his case did not look good enough to insure his VICTORY. Miller's plan was a well thought out attack on Maloney's civil rights. Miller first prepared adverse statements to bias a Jury toward conviction. The second step was to select a point in the closing arguments to introduce this totally new information, as evidence to the Jury.
Information that had never been part of the trial process. The point of introduction of the new evidence in the final closing arguments was also calculated. Based on standard trial procedures, Miller selected a point to obstruct the defense's chance of any rebuttal. This reporters past experience in this type of corruption would also indicate that Miller took into consideration who the Judge was, and what that Judge's actions had been in the past, on other DOJ Prosecutorial Misconduct occurrences.
A clear intent by Miller to obstruct justice in the court room. DOJ Attorney Steve Miller would later admit to a hearing Judge that he had intentionally, knowingly, preplanned to "Sandbag" the defense in front of the Jury. Many average citizens have gone to prison for far less corruption in a Federal court room, but they were not public prosecutors like Miller. A prosecutor with a corrupt employer like the DOJ that has a long documented history of covering up public corruption, involving public union law enforcement employees.
When contacted by this reporter, Miller repeatedly stated that he had not done anything wrong, and that an internal investigation by the DOJ had cleared him of any wrong doing. Miller also stated that he had not been punished in any manner, as a result of his conduct in the Maloney case.
It was also apparent that Miller was very concerned that this reporter was investigating him, and the DOJ's conduct in the Maloney case. Miller's initial statements were, the Appellate Court supported his position. Miller corrected his statement, when this reported advised him that the video tape from the Ninth Circuit had been viewed by this reporter, and the Ninth Circuit definitely did not agree with his conduct. Miller then stated he was referring to the first court hearing, not the second.
Miller was advised this investigation was not focused on him, but was primarily about the DOJ's similar cover up conduct in past cases. Miller was given the details on several cases including the DDA Marugg sex predator case in 2010 and 2011. A case where the DOJ/FBI had conspired with the San Diego DA's Office to cover up DDA Marugg's 10 years of Sex Escapades, leaving more than a dozen female victims blowing in the wing, simply to obstruct civil liability claims against the DA's Office. Miller became frantic about being connected to a Sex Predator Prosecutor. Miller was advised that the people that should be concerned about that information getting out was the FBI/DOJ, and USA Laura Duffy.
All available evidence indicates that Maloney would have most likely been found guilty in any event. In fact, when the conviction was overturned, and a new trial ordered, Maloney worked out a plea bargain. However, the real issue, and problem, is that far too many public prosecutors regularly, and intentionally violate the law, and the civil rights of defendants, inside and outside of court rooms. Primarily to pump up their conviction rates, advance their personal careers, and their associated finances.
All with the confidence that no matter what they do, they will be protected from accountability, due to there law enforcement employee position. The major corruption is that not all of these victims are guilty, a corrupt Judge seals their fate, and rarely do the cases ever gets to an interested Appellet Court hearing, like the Maloney case.
THE JUDGE CORRUPTION
As usual, when DOJ, or other Prosecutor court room public corruption occurs, all the offenders need for the criminal scheme to work is a friendly Judge. A Judge that will blindly, and intentionally support the obvious Prosecutor corruption.
Enter Friendly Federal Court Judge Dana M. Sabraw. A Federal Judge who was either totally incompetent, or criminally biased in favor of the DOJ, regarding clear civil rights violations, and obvious Proprietorial Misconduct in his court room. Judge Sabraw's bio/resume clearly indicates he is not in the incompetent category, and his multiple rulings against Maloney following the civil rights violations clearly shows his bias.
When Defense Council Lemon objected multiple time, to DOJ Attorney Miller's corrupt statements, Judge Sabraw blocked the objections, and reportedly stated "this is council's argument, it is up to the jury to determine the facts". A statement that legal experts far and wide found to be incredibly negligent, especially from a Judge with Sabraw's experience, and so did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges.
THE DOJ COVER UP CONSPIRACY & THE MOTIVES
The Maloney Case violations were so obvious, that even a lay attorney would recognize the obvious civil rights violations, and the denial of a fair trial, as did the Ninth Circuit Court two years later. More importantly, from the moment that Defense Attorney Lemon requested a mistrial, the DOJ, and U.S Attorney Laura Duffy were on notice of AUSA Miller's "Misconduct".
If USA Laura Duffy, and the DOJ of San Diego were honest, ethical, defenders of justice, they would have IMMEDIATELY placed Miller on suspension pending a full investigation. The DOJ would have filed a motion with the court to reverse the conviction, regardless of their views on Maloney's guilt or innocence. However, Duffy and the DOJ are NOT honest, ethical, defenders of justice, and their real life conduct makes that very clear.
During the time period between Maloney's arrest, and Duffy's appointment, in June 2010, and his conviction reversal in 2014, the DOJ/FBI San Diego organized crime family was actively obstructing and covering up more than a hundred know cases of public corruption. Some of which involved the intentional prosecution of innocent citizens, and evidence tampering in arrest, prosecutions, and trials, on a massive scale.
Not to mention the wide ranging obstruction of justice conspiracies involving local Police, Prosecutor's, Judges, and Elected Officials in California. All of which were using their positions in law enforcement to cover up each others felony public corruption crimes, and openly threatening anyone, including cops that tried to report it. All of which the LAW DEFINES AS ORGANIZED CRIME.
If there is any doubt about what the DOJ/FBI and other Public Agencies knew, and when they knew it, the public record evidence speaks for itself. This reporters in person notifications were recorded on audio, and copies of all public record evidence documents discovered in investigations were sent, or hand delivered to the FBI/DOJ with signatures required to confirm receipt. These documents, and complaints were not happily received by the DOJ/FBI, or any other public law enforcement agencies. Many were met with threats of arrest, and prosecution, if this reporter did not stop investigating and publishing.
The long list of corruption cover up by the DOJ/FBI even includes protecting a SERIAL DA SEX PREDADOR'S 10 YEAR SEX CRIMES SPREE IN SAN DIEGO, AND A DOCUMENTED SAN DIEGO DA FELONY CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO COVER IT UP. A DA conspiracy planned and executed to bury the legal rights of more than a dozen female victims, to protect the DA Office's finances from civil litigation.
A DA criminal conspiracy between the DA leadership, the Deputy District Attorneys Association, Sex Predator DDA Marugg, and his attorney. A criminal cover up that lead directly to the CALIFORNIA STATE BAR OFFICES and their "SO CALLED" WATCH DOG Board of Trustees. Most of the corruption cover up is directly linked to a First Responder Election Fraud in Oceanside, California, in one way or another. An election fraud financially linked to the re-election campaigns of Judges, DA's, Attorney Generals, and a Governor. All directly involved in aiding AND abetting the criminal cover up.
Every major News Group in Souther California knew about the extensive public corruption, including CNN & Fox News, while actively obstructing reporting and investigations to protect the law enforcement unions. Public Corruption conspiracies where some News Groups were actually conspiring with the unions to falsify the elections for CASH PAYMENTS.
This former Police Officer Reporter's 40 years of investigation experience in criminal and civil issues makes it clear that the DOJ and USA Laura Duffy once again conspired to obstruct justice in the Maloney case. If either claims they did not know about Miller's in trial corruption with the end of the trial, and defense Attorney Lemon's request for a mistrial, then they definitely knew when the first appeal was filed by Defense Attorney Lemon.
The DOJ and USA Duffy's only response was to immediately use all the legal and financial resources of the DOJ to bury the Appeal, and cover up the crimes of AUSA Miller. Just like they had done on so many previous court room public corruptions cases in San Diego County.
The DOJ's obstruction conspiracy in the Maloney case cost hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars, and years of litigation. All planned and executed to cover up Court Room public corruption crimes, while the DOJ openly lied about the corruption at every turn. The Penal Code calls that intentionally mis-use of public money to cover up crimes, a Criminal Fraud Conspiracy.
THE JUDICIAL CORRUPTION & WHY IT HAPPENS
To say that the Maloney case is an EXTRODINARY & UNUSUAL view of our Court System is a major understatement. The vast majority of Prosecutor Misconduct violations are systematically buried by Judges, like Federal Court Judge Dana M. Sabraw, as quickly and quietly as possible. The Judicial System does not want the public to know how corrupted the system has become.
Many innocent people go to jail or prison every year because Judges typically side with, and protect corrupt Prosecutors, and law enforcement officers, that commit crimes in their courts. Mostly because Judges re-election campaigns depend almost totally on the financial support, and the political endorsements of Prosecutor, and Law Enforcement Unions. No Judge in his right mind wants Police and Prosecutor Unions, openly opposing their re-election, as was clearly demonstrated in the Oceanside Police & Firefighter election fraud conspiracy.
THE NINTH CIRCUIT HAMMERING
A two year DOJ/FBI conspiracy to obstruct justice that ended with a very public ridicule, and condemnation of the DOJ's corruption, by the Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals. A public ridicule recorded on Video Tape, which was then forced onto the DOJ by multiple Judges. The Judicial suggestions, or court orders if you prefer, was the video recording was to be used in DOJ attorney training sessions, as an example of what DOJ attorneys SHOULD NOT DO to obstruct the FAIR TRIAL mandates in the Federal Courts. Unfortunately, the Court Judges simply ignored all of the felony criminal conduct of the DOJ Attorneys, and the DOJ/FBI was not going to investigate and prosecute itself, so they got a free pass.
The Maloney case not only got to the Appellate Court, it got there twice. The first time it received the usual rubber stamp of cover up. Most likely reasons are, most of the reviewing Judges were too lazy, or to indifferent to care, and a corrupt Prosecutor's career was on the line.
In most cases Judges blame their lack of interest on a poorly submitted bill of circumstances by the filing attorney. Once a case has been decided in a lower court, most Judges DO NOT want to be bothered, especially when the defendant is not viewed as likable, or honest.
When the Ninth Circuit decided to hear the Maloney Case Appeal a second time, EXTRODINARY & UNUSUAL simply got MORE EXTRODINARY & UNUSUAL. However, what followed in the Court Room is difficult to put into words.
An Appellate Court that not only recognized the obvious DOJ corruption during, and after the Maloney trial, there were Appellate Judges that were openly, visibly, disgusted with the overall conduct of the DOJ. Appellate Judges that spent the entire DOJ argument time period ridiculing, and laughing as the presentation of senior DOJ attorney, AUSA Bruce Castetter, that was still trying to cover up the corruption.
Castetter is repeatedly admonished by Judge Prederson that a defendant is entitled to a FAIR TRIAL in our Justice System, and making it obvious that Maloney did not get a FAIR TRIAL from the DOJ. A one hour video, however, the last half with AUSA Castetter is Saturday Night Live Material on criminal public corruption. The full body hits on the DOJ are so numerous it would be difficult to list them all in this article, so every citizen should watch the Video. Many legal reviews of this appeal are published on the Internet. The video can be viewed on YouTube, at the below link, or a Google, or YouTube search for "United States Vs. John Maloney" will find the video.
The Appellate Judges comments and open ridicule made it clear to AUSA Castetter, and the DOJ, that when Miller's Prosecutorial Misconduct occurred in 2011, the DOJ should have immediately filed documents with the Court to set aside the verdict. It was also obvious that the Appellate Judges believed it should not have been necessary to bring this Appeal to the Court, in the first place.
The message was so clear that the DOJ and USA Laura Duffy must have been scrambling down in San Diego. Likely a full panic to write and file documents with the court requesting the verdict be set aside, and a new trial ordered. Primarily a continuing cover up of the corruption, and to try to save as much DOJ public image as possible. The appeal hearing was argued on September 19, 2013, and the DOJ was filing the dismissal documents on October 7, 2013. Within days of that filing the DOJ was arguing that the Maloney case was a great example of Justice, and how it was designed to work.
THE REAL FACTS
The facts are, the DOJ, USA Duffy, and their staffs knowingly entered into a TWO YEAR criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice, and cover up AUSA Miller's OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS in the Maloney case. They spend hundred of thousand of tax dollar, and abused the legal resources of the Department of Justice, to cover up public corruption crimes. It should also be noted that this is not the first time, or the second, or even the tenth time in recent years, that the DOJ/FBI have conspired to perpetrate and/or cover up public corruption crimes inside and outside our courts.
Eight years of public corruption investigations in San Diego County, by this reporter, has disclosed an extensive culture of prosecutor public corruption, like a highly contagious virus infecting all the law enforcement public unions, and the virus is not limited to California. Corruption in which the DOJ/FBI regularly, criminally conspire, with Police of all types, other Prosecutors, and Judges to manipulate, hide, destroy, and falsify evidence in criminal arrest and prosecutions. Simply to "win at all cost", but mostly to cover up their own crimes.
A legal system that has absolutely nothing to do with what the public thinks is "Justice". If Justice was ever part of the process, it was Murdered and thrown in a ditch by corrupt, cops, DA's, Judges, elected officials, and greedy News Organizations, a long time ago, under the protection of the DOJ/FBI. A MURDER to advance their finances, and political agendas. Even in cases where they know the citizen is innocent, the citizen is buried with the financial abuse of agencies, to protect the public corruption of the law enforcement employees, and the flow of tax dollars into the public unions, and the DOJ/FBI is no exception.
PART III - A DOJ/FBI CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF SAN DIEGO DA BONNINE DUMANIS RUN FOR MAYOR HAS EXPOSED A DOJ/FBI HIT SQUAD OPERATION THAT IS USED TO PROSECUTE REPUBLICANS, WHILE PROTECTING THE DEMOCRAT AND UNION CO-CONSPIRATORS !!!
Woodrow Higdon
Investigative Photo Journalist